Blog

  • Buy a Wrap & Get a FREE Sandwich at Jimmy John’s Starting July 3rd

    Buy a Wrap & Get a FREE Sandwich at Jimmy John’s Starting July 3rd

    [ad_1]

    Jimmy John’s coupons and offers to satisfy your cravings!

    a jimmy johns toasted sandwich and wrap

    From July 3rd through July 6th, Jimmy John’s Rewards members (free to join) can score a FREE Toasted Sandwich when they purchase a Wrap! Note that this offer will be available in your rewards account.

    You can choose from a Chicken Caesar, Kickin’ Ranch Chicken, or Tuscan Italian Wrap and get a Chicken Bacon Ranch, Ultimate Italian, or Roast Beef Cheddar Toasted Sandwich for free!

    Here’s the toasty deal…

    man showing Jimmy John's app on phone

    Join Jimmy John’s Freaky Fast Rewards Program for a FREE sandwich & more!

    Love Jimmy John’s? Consider joining Jimmy John’s Freaky Fast Rewards (free to join), where you’ll earn points on every order placed in the app, online, over the phone, and in-store. Just make sure you’re logged into your Jimmy John’s account when ordering online or in the app to earn your points. By logging in, you’re also able to save your favorite orders, making it even easier to order each time!

    Even better, when you sign up for Freaky Fast Rewards, you will earn a FREE sandwich after your very first order using the rewards program! Simply sign up and start earning points with every purchase made. Now that’s a great way to snag an easy lunch!

    Plus, you can pay with your phone, score points on your birthday, engage in bonus challenges, earn achievement badges, and get special surprises.

    Jimmy John's Takeout

    Jimmy John’s makes it easy to grab your favorite sandwich! They offer delivery, drive-thru at select locations, and even curbside pickup. Just place your order online for a delicious sandwich, choose your pickup or delivery options, and you’ll be enjoying your meal in no time.

    They offer a variety of delicious sandwiches, including vegetarian, keto, and more. Plus, each sub can be customized the way you want it. You can even swap out the bread for a lettuce wrap to cut down on carbs.

    Have you fallen in love with Jimmy John’s bread? You can order just a loaf of French bread, too, and make your sandwiches at home or enjoy it with your favorite soups and stews. Note that the availability of fresh French bread may vary by location, so you might want to check with your local store before ordering online.


    Jimmy John’s has keto options, too! Check out our dining guide before you order!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI

    Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI

    [ad_1]

    An open letter from authors including Lauren Groff, Lev Grossman, R.F. Kuang, Dennis Lehane, and Geoffrey Maguire calls on book publishers to pledge to limit their use of AI tools, for example by committing to only hire human audiobook narrators.

    The letter argues that authors’ work has been “stolen” by AI companies: “Rather than paying writers a small percentage of the money our work makes for them, someone else will be paid for a technology built on our unpaid labor.”

    Among other commitments, the authors call for publishers to “make a pledge that they will never release books that were created by machine” and “not replace their human staff with AI tools or degrade their positions into AI monitors.”

    While the initial letter was signed by an already impressive list of writers, NPR reports that another 1,100 signatures were added in the 24 hours after it was initially published.

    Authors are also suing tech companies over using their books to train AI models, but federal judges dealt significant blows to those lawsuits earlier this week.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Katie Couric Calls Lauren Sanchez’s Vogue Cover in Wedding Dress ‘Tacky’

    Katie Couric Calls Lauren Sanchez’s Vogue Cover in Wedding Dress ‘Tacky’

    [ad_1]

    Lauren Sanchez
    Katie Couric Throws Shade at Vogue Cover …
    Looking ‘Tacky’ in Your Wedding Dress!!!

    Published


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Backs Meta in Dispute Over Canada’s Digital Services Tax

    Trump Backs Meta in Dispute Over Canada’s Digital Services Tax

    [ad_1]

    It looks like Mark Zuckerberg is finally seeing some return for his support for U.S. President Donald Trump, though not quite in the way he would have hoped.

    Today, President Trump has announced that the U.S. will cease all trade discussions with Canada in response to the Canadian government seeking to impose what amounts to unfair taxes on U.S. technology platforms, including Meta.

    Well, really, primarily Meta, though the “taxes” in this case are not really new.

    Back in 2023, Canadian officials introduced the “Online News Act,” which is ostensibly designed to address imbalances in the local news ecosystem, by forcing large online platforms, like Meta and Google, to pay Canadian publishers for news content that’s shared across their platforms. But both Meta and Google pushed back against the bill, saying that the proposed regulations don’t accurately reflect the state of the modern news ecosystem, but the Canadian government pushed ahead anyway, which eventually saw Meta block all Canadian news outlets in its apps.

    That ban remains in place, which means that Meta’s not currently paying any of these imposed costs put in place by the bill.

    In order to address this, last year, Canadian officials introduced an alternative “Digital Services Tax,” which will see digital services operating in the region that bring in more than $20 million per annum charged a 3% tax on their local earnings (above that $20m threshold). That means that Meta, even if it isn’t using local news publisher content, will still have to pay to operate in the region.

    The first payments are due next week. 

    Which has now seemingly been brought to the attention of Trump, who’s responded with reciprocal penalties for what he sees as penalties that unfairly target U.S. tech platforms.

    As per Trump (via Truth Social):

    We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country. They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately.”

    Trump further noted that the White House will let Canada know the tariff that they’ll have to pay “to do business with the United States” within seven days.

    Which is another addition to the tariffs and penalties that Trump has already imposed on Canada trade, and as such, it seems unlikely that this will have much impact on the Canadian government’s actions on this front.

    But still, it does seem surprising that Trump’s only just realized that this bill exists, given that Meta blocked news in its apps in Canada almost two years ago, and that the Digital Services Tax was announced last year.

    But even so, this is the exact reason why Zuck and Co. have sought to cosy up to the second Trump Administration, in order to call on the White House to push back against penalties like this, as well as regulations in Europe, which it believes unfairly focus on its business.

    Indeed, over the past few years, EU regulators have fined Meta, on average, around $1 billion per year due to breaches of its increasingly complex Digital Services Act.

    Zuckerberg has repeatedly criticized these penalties, noting in an interview earlier this year that:

    The EU has fined the tech companies more than $30 billion over the last, I think it was like 10 or 20 years, so when you think about it, what it really adds up to is this kind of EU-wide policy for how they want to deal with American tech. It’s almost like a tariff, and I think the US government basically gets to decide how they’re going to deal with it.”

    Zuckerberg says that the American technology industry is “a bright spot in the American economy,” and as such, it’s of strategic advantage for the U.S. Government to defend that.

    Which is where he’s hoping his fealty to Trump will benefit Meta, in pushing back against EU regulations specifically. And while Canada is a lesser consideration on this front, the fact that Trump is taking a stand would clearly be music to the ears of Meta’s executive team.

    But will Trump be as willing to push back against EU penalties?

    The Trump administration has flagged that it will take a stand. Earlier this year, for example, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) publicly criticized the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which he says is “incompatible with America’s free speech tradition.” Vice President JD Vance also criticized EU regulations, while Trump himself has also threatened European imports with tariffs in penalty for tech regulations that harm U.S. companies.

    Though Trump has stopped short of taking specific action against European regulators as yet.

    In this sense, Canada is a softer target, and one that Trump is already beating up on with other tariffs and penalties. So it’s not quite what Meta wants, but if it does end up saving the company from more penalties, and big fines from such, it could still be worth the PR hit that Zuckerberg has taken in re-aligning Meta’s approach in line with Trump’s wishes.

    But it’s the EU rules that Meta really wants the White House to push back on.

    And with European officials looking to impose even more fines on the company, we’ll see if Meta gets the full benefit of its new political allegiance.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Politics Is So Insanely Complicated in 2025

    Why Politics Is So Insanely Complicated in 2025

    [ad_1]

    All our machines are broken.
    Photo-Illustration: Getty Images

    Every major news story in the past week had one thing in common: none of it was remotely simple or easy to explain. The basic facts surrounding the U.S. attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities were obscured by walls of secrecy and spin. The New York mayoral primary was hard to predict thanks to the city’s complex ranked choice voting system and the byzantine alliances and rivalries it spawned. And above all, the domestic governance of the country continued to be snarled in arcane judicial, congressional, and executive branch procedures.

    Systemic chaos and confusion have been the reigning leifmotif of the second Trump presidency. If your grasp of the way government is supposed to work is based on Schoolhouse Rock or social studies lessons on “how a bill becomes law,” the last five months or so must have been baffling to you. It’s not an accident, either: Donald Trump’s ways of doing business make the normal business practices of the public sector all but impossible.

    Congress has done remarkably little this year other than slowly and erratically tinker on the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill. When reconciliation bills were conceived of in the early ‘70s, they were meant to provide some budgetary discipline to Congress. Over time they have become the principle way for majority parties with governing trifectas to enact massive collections of legislation without fear of a Senate filibuster. Reconciliation bills, put simply, are a way to take power from the minority party. They are tailor-made for a president with authoritarian tendencies and largely undivided party support to ram through a vast agenda. And so, unsurprisingly, the 2025 reconciliation bill is bigger and badder than any of its predecessors. During his first term in 2017, Congress packaged Trump’s agenda into two reconciliation bills. This time he insisted on doing everything at once, creating a truly monstrous megabill.

    Budget reconciliation bills have their own incredibly obscure and complex set of rules and procedures that confound everyone but a small tribe of budget wonks. There are multiple layers to the development of a megabill, from a budget resolution that sets targets, to “reconciliation instructions” that tell House and Senate committees what to produce in the way of revenues and spending, to all-night Senate “vote-a-ramas” where the minority party gets to offer dozens of symbolic amendments designed to make the majority look bad. Once the assembled bill reaches the Senate, that chamber’s nonpartisan parliamentarian rules on which provisions fail to meet the criteria for inclusion in such bills. Then the majority party will try to put Humpty Dumpty back together by tweaking the offending provisions, or altering other items to make the overall arithmetic work. All this is happening very quickly, and largely behind the scenes. And then the House has to accept changes made by the Senate or the whole wild process more or less starts over.

    Figuring out where things stand at any given moment with a reconciliation bill is all but impossible, so people rely on big partisan narratives. To Republicans, Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill is a carefully wrought device to extend and create tax cuts for people who deserve them; to boost national defense and border security spending; to reverse the “open borders” policies of the Biden administration; and to reduce government “waste, fraud and abuse.” To Democrats it’s an abominable reverse-Robin Hood measure to give tax cuts to the wealthy at the expense of vulnerable poor and middle-class Americans, whose Medicaid, Obamacare, and SNAP benefits will be slashed. Each party accuses the other of fiscal profligacy. Sometimes Republicans jockeying for leverage in their own caucuses temporarily agree with Democrats and yell and posture, but it’s understood that in the end they will toe the party line. No one will read the final bills that Trump will likely push through the House and Senate. So how can citizens comprehend the consequences until the dust clears and the new laws are fully implemented? They really can’t; it’s all based on partisanship, trust, selective information, and gut instincts. Civics in action it isn’t. And it’s all being done this way because Trump has insisted on making the Big Beautiful Bill a testament to his own power and historical significance.

    The chaos in the judicial branch is arguably even worse. Since the Trump administration is determined to expand presidential powers to the breaking point, it is inviting and sometimes initiating litigation in the federal courts on a vast array of issues. In general challenges to Trump’s policies have succeeded more often than not in the lower courts. But many issues will only be resolved when they reach a deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court. Indeed, on the final day of that Court’s current term, the conservative majority restricted the ability of lower-court judges to put a hold on the administration’s many power grabs through nationwide injunctions. So more than ever, all roads lead to incredibly high-stakes decisions by the Supreme Court, three of whose members owe their life-time appointments to Trump.

    That same Supreme Court, moreover, is increasingly prone to issuing temporary orders with no explanation. This often helps the administration work its will, but leaves a lot of questions unresolved, as the Brennan Center recently explained:

    Today, the justices grant relief in contentious shadow docket cases twice as often as they did just a few years ago. The surge in issuing this relief has coincided with Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joining the Court.

    It’s hard to avoid the suspicion that Supreme Court conservatives are trying to hide their tracks on controversial cases. Just this week the Court permitted the administration to resume deporting immigrants to random and often dangerous countries other than their own without a hearing — and the decision was made with no oral arguments and no majority opinion. Who knows what it means in the long run? Those without a law school education and a huge amount of time on their hands will be lost trying to follow it all.

    On top of everything else, the Trump 2.0 executive branch has engaged in an incredible amount of secrecy and procedural chaos, all of it making it hard to know what will happen to the federal government and millions of federal employees. Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative may be winding down a bit with its chief’s recent departure from the administration. But the damage it wreaked throughout the public sector via arbitrary mass firings, lockdowns of agencies and programs, refusals to pay invoices, and sheer terror tactics by embedded teams of totally inexperienced data geeks, will live on for years. And anyone relying on, much less working on, federal programs and benefits will be seeing shadow ninjas jumping out of the walls to blow it all up for a long time.

    Post-Musk, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought has emerged as the real quarterback of executive branch aggressive chaos. The steely Christian nationalist and Project 2025 co-creator wants to shrink the federal government radically. He’s renowned for pursing all sorts of obscure power-grabbing measures that only a handful of people fully understand, including spending rescissions (cancellation of previously appropriated funds, which must be approved by Congress), spending deferrals (delays in releasing previously appropriated funds, which can be overriden by Congress), “pocket rescissions” (deferrals issued just before the end of the fiscal year so that Congress won’t have time to override them), and impoundments (blatant refusals to spend appropriated dollars). It’s all in play.

    Top it all off with a powerful president who is famously erratic, and it’s hard to see the road ahead, or even the road underneath one’s feet right now. To understand any given issue you need to know where it stands in the latest version of the budget bill; whether it’s subject to federal court litigation; what the executive branch is doing to undermine the prerogatives of Congress and the courts; and what priorities Trump may choose at any given moment. It’s a lot, every minute of every day, and the relentless chaos fostered by the 47th president continues to defy every single precedent.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rocket Classic: Collin Morikawa and Matthew Fitzpatrick in chasing pack as Aldrich Potgieter leads by two ahead of final round | Golf News

    Rocket Classic: Collin Morikawa and Matthew Fitzpatrick in chasing pack as Aldrich Potgieter leads by two ahead of final round | Golf News

    [ad_1]

    Aldrich Potgieter will take a two-shot lead into the final round of the Rocket Classic with major champions Collin Morikawa and Matthew Fitzpatrick among the chasing pack

    Potgieter – eyeing a first PGA Tour title after losing to Brian Campbell in a play-off at the Mexico Open in February – carded a seven-under 65 in his third round at Detroit Golf Club.

    The South African, 20, birdied six of his first eight holes, including five in a row.

    Potgieter sits at 19 under for the event with his nearest challengers five Americans on 17 under – Max Greyserman, Andrew Putnam, Jake Knapp, Mark Hubbard and Chris Kirk.

    Knapp birdied his final three holes to sign for a 66, having snatched the course record from Potgieter on Friday with an 11-under 61, a day after the South African youngster had registered a 10-under 62.

    Morikawa is four shots adrift of Potgieter on 15 under – the same mark as England’s Harry Hall – after shooting four under on Saturday, with Hall’s compatriot Fitzpatrick matching Morikawa’s third-round efforts to sit five back on 14 under.

    Morikawa and Fitzpatrick are winless on the PGA Tour since 2023, when the former triumphed at the Zozo Championship and the latter at the RBC Heritage.

    American Davis Thompson is alongside Fitzpatrick on 14 under after a third-round 66 which featured three eagles on his front nine.

    Watch the final round of the Rocket Classic live on Sky Sports Golf from 4.30pm on Sunday or stream without a contract.

    Golf Now logo.

    Get the best prices and book a round at one of 1,700 courses across the UK & Ireland

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bitcoin removes pressure from USD

    Bitcoin removes pressure from USD

    [ad_1]

    United States President Donald Trump recently touted the positive impacts of Bitcoin (BTC) on the US economy, including relieving “pressure” from the US dollar during Friday’s White House press conference.

    The President said that he is a fan of the crypto industry, which has grown into a sector that cannot be ignored due to geostrategic competition. Trump added:

    “It has become amazing. I mean, it is the jobs that it produces, and I notice more and more you pay in Bitcoin. People are saying it takes a lot of pressure off the dollar, and it is a great thing for our country.”

    Digital asset researcher Anders X suggested that Trump’s comments were a reference to the Triffin Dilemma, or the conflict of interest between being the issuer of the global reserve currency, maintaining proper trade balances, and ensuring the long-term value of the currency.

    Dollar, Bitcoin Price, Economics, Economy, US Government, United States, Donald Trump, Bitcoin Adoption
    Trump speaking at Friday’s White House Press Conference. Source: The White House

    As the issuer of the global reserve currency, the US must run persistent trade deficits to meet the global demand for dollars so foreign countries can settle trade and use the dollar as a store of value against more rapidly depreciating local fiat currencies.

    This provides a short-term solution to meet global liquidity demands at the cost of the long-term value of the currency, as persistent trade deficits are financed through money creation, which dilutes the value of the US dollar.

    Dollar, Bitcoin Price, Economics, Economy, US Government, United States, Donald Trump, Bitcoin Adoption
    The Federal Reserve M2 money supply, a measure of the total supply of US dollars, continues to climb, diluting the value of each individual dollar. Source: TradingView

    Trump previously floated the idea of paying off the national debt with Bitcoin, a nod to the asymmetry between the inflationary dollar and the supply-capped asset.

    However, critics have said that even if the US Treasury owned the entire BTC supply, it would still not be enough to cover the $37 trillion and growing US government debt, which will only continue to grow, eventually collapsing the value of the dollar.

    Related: Trump sidesteps question on crypto divesting to pass key bills

    “Nothing stops this train,” deficits and total debt to climb, analysts say

    Macroeconomist and Bitcoin advocate Lyn Alden coined the phrase “nothing stops this train” — a reference to the extreme likelihood that global governments will never stop printing money and destroying the future value of their national currencies.

    The dollar currency index (DXY), a metric that tracks the strength of the US dollar against a basket of major fiat currencies, hit its lowest level in three years on Thursday.

    Declining dollar strength comes amid elevated US government bond yields, a signal of deteriorating investor confidence in the creditworthiness of the US government and the sustainability of its debt.

    Magazine: TradFi fans ignored Lyn Alden’s BTC tip — Now she says it’ll hit 7 figures: X Hall of Flame

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.