Blog

  • Jalapeño Chicken | The Recipe Critic

    Jalapeño Chicken | The Recipe Critic

    [ad_1]

    This website may contain affiliate links and advertising so that we can provide recipes to you. Read my disclosure policy.

    Delicious Jalapeño Chicken will become an instant favorite with the very first bite. Tender chicken pieces are cooked with jalapeños and then coated in a sticky, sweet, and spicy sauce. Serve over rice for an easy meal. You’ll be craving it on repeat!

    Overhead shot of plated jalapeño chicken served over rice. Overhead shot of plated jalapeño chicken served over rice.

    Reasons You’ll Love This Recipe

    • So Much Flavor: Imagine perfectly cooked tender chicken coated with the most incredibly spiced sauce. This meal is full of flavor you’ll want to share with everyone.
    • Simple: The ingredient list might seem long, but most of the ingredients are pantry staples. Plus, this meal comes together quickly, making it perfect for busy weeknights.
    • Versatile: Feel free to customize this jalapeño chicken to fit your taste preferences and use the ingredients you have available.

    Ingredients for Making Jalapeño Chicken

    If you love spicy food, then this Asian-inspired jalapeño chicken is for you! The recipe starts with breaded pieces of chicken and sauteed with jalapeño slices, diced onion, and minced garlic. Then, add the sweet, savory, spicy sauce and cook everything together until it’s warm and flavorful. Everyone will be begging for seconds! See the recipe card at the bottom of the post for exact measurements.

    Chicken

    • Boneless Skinless Chicken Breasts: Cut these into cubes that are similar in size so that they cook evenly. 
    • Breading: A mix of cornstarch and all-purpose flour coats the chicken so that it’s crispy on the outside.
    • Salt and Pepper: To flavor the chicken.
    • Vegetable Oil: This is a great oil for cooking the chicken and veggies.
    • Onion: Diced and sautéed to provide the recipe with a complex depth of flavor.
    • Jalapeños: Sliced and sautéed with the chicken to release their heat and flavor the dish.
    • Garlic: Freshly minced garlic infuses the meal with a wonderful savory flavor!
    Overhead shot of labeled chicken ingredients. Overhead shot of labeled chicken ingredients.

    Sauce

    • Chicken Broth: Creates the perfect base for the sauce while providing savory flavor.
    • Soy Sauce: Adds major savory, salty flavor to the sauce. Use low-sodium if desired.
    • Shaoxing Wine: This is a common rice wine used in Chinese cooking. It has a slightly sweet and briny flavor. You can sub with sherry wine, if you’d like.
    • Brown Sugar: Balances out the spicy and savory flavors with a hint of sweet.
    • Ground Ginger: Adds a peppery spice and sweetness.
    • Jalapeño: Gives an extra kick of heat to the sauce.
    • Cornstarch: Used to thicken the sauce.
    • Rice: Try serving the chicken over my perfect instant pot white rice.
    Overhead shot of labeled sauce ingredients. Overhead shot of labeled sauce ingredients.

    How to Make Jalapeño Chicken

    Get ready for a huge punch of flavor with this jalapeño chicken recipe! It’s a breeze to make, uses simple ingredients, and is beyond delicious! I love how the chicken is crispy on the outside and tender on the inside. Then, it’s drenched in the sauce, which really takes it to the next level!

    1. Make the Sauce: Mix the sauce ingredients in a small bowl and set aside. In a separate large bowl, whisk together the cornstarch, all-purpose flour, salt, and pepper.
    2. Bread the Chicken: Dice the chicken breast into 1-inch cubes. Toss the cubed chicken into the cornstarch and flour mixture until every piece is coated. Heat the vegetable oil in a large skillet or wok over medium-high heat.
    3. Cook: Carefully place the breaded chicken into the skillet. Cook the chicken, stirring continuously, until it has all been seared evenly, about 5 minutes.
    4. Sauté the Veggies: Add in the onion and jalapeños, and continue to sauté until tender and the chicken is browned. Add in the garlic and sauté for another minute.
    5. Add the Sauce: Pour the sauce mixture over the chicken and vegetables. Reduce the heat to medium-low, and cook until the sauce thickens and coats everything evenly.
    6. Serve: Remove the chicken from heat and serve fresh over rice. Enjoy!

    Tips and Variations

    Even though this recipe is easy to follow, here are some tips to make it perfect for you!

    • Chicken Thighs: Feel free to swap the chicken breasts for boneless chicken thighs for juicer chicken. 
    • Soy Allergy: If you have a soy allergy, then use tamari or coconut aminos to replace the soy sauce
    • Reduce the Heat: Remove the seeds from your jalapeños to reduce the heat slightly. But remember, this will be a spicy dish either way.
    • Add Oil: You may need to add more oil after cooking the chicken before adding the jalapeños and onions.

    Close up shot of jalapeño chicken with a wooden serving spoon in a skillet. Close up shot of jalapeño chicken with a wooden serving spoon in a skillet.

    Storing Leftover Jalapeño Chicken

    Leftover jalapeño chicken stores well and is great for quick lunches and dinners over the next few days! Transfer it to an airtight container and store it in the fridge for up to 4 days.

    Close up shot of someone using chopsticks to get a bite of the plated jalapeño chicken. Close up shot of someone using chopsticks to get a bite of the plated jalapeño chicken.

    More Delicious Chicken Recipes

    No boring chicken recipes around here! We have tons of flavorful ways to serve a protein-packed meal. Here are a few of my family’s favorites. They are all so easy and tasty!

    Pin this now to find it later

    Pin It

    • Mix the sauce ingredients in a small bowl and set aside. In a separate large bowl, whisk together the cornstarch, all-purpose flour, salt, and pepper.

    • Dice the chicken breast into 1-inch cubes. Toss the cubed chicken into the cornstarch and flour mixture until coated. Heat the vegetable oil in a large skillet or wok over medium-high heat.

    • Carefully place the breaded chicken in the skillet. Cook the chicken, stirring continuously, until seared evenly, about 5 minutes.

    • Add the onion and jalapeños, and continue to saute everything together until tender and the chicken is browned. Add in the garlic and saute for another minute.

    • Pour the sauce mixture over the chicken and vegetables, reduce the heat to medium-low, and cook until the sauce thickens and coats everything evenly.

    • Remove the chicken from heat and serve fresh over rice.

    This is a spicy recipe, to reduce some of the heat you can remove the seeds from the jalapeños before using them. 

    Calories: 515kcalCarbohydrates: 41gProtein: 41gFat: 18gSaturated Fat: 3gPolyunsaturated Fat: 9gMonounsaturated Fat: 4gTrans Fat: 0.1gCholesterol: 109mgSodium: 2515mgPotassium: 798mgFiber: 1gSugar: 15gVitamin A: 167IUVitamin C: 16mgCalcium: 40mgIron: 2mg

    Nutrition information is automatically calculated, so should only be used as an approximation.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Violence and the Labor Struggle in Industrializing America: the 1910 LA Times Bombing

    Violence and the Labor Struggle in Industrializing America: the 1910 LA Times Bombing

    [ad_1]

    During the late 19th and early 20th centuries American labor fought a sustained battle against American capitalists over who should determine the wages, hours, and working conditions in America’s booming factories—ownership or the workers. Battle tactics included dueling messaging in friendly publications, lobbying for favorable laws, and confrontations between strikes and strikebreakers. As is well-known, the struggle grew intense and violent during labor protests like the 1886 rally at Haymarket Square and the 1892 Homestead Strike. Less well known is labor activists’ occasional resort to sabotage of anti-union business establishments. In 1910, the Los Angeles Times, a strident anti-union voice in a staunch anti-union state, was a target of domestic violence that took the lives of 21 of its employees. 

    Why the LA Times Was Targeted

    Los Angeles Times building, after the bombing disaster on October 1, 1910. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

    During a highly successful career, the newspaper’s owner, Harrison Gray Otis, had become the political enemy of all unions and a symbol of capitalistic intransigence to worker rights. A delegate to the 1860 Republican Convention, Otis served with distinction in the Civil War, rising to the rank of brevet lieutenant colonel. Following the conflict, he moved to Los Angeles, seeking his fortune in the newspaper business. He landed a job, making $15 a month with the LA Times, but soon saved enough money to purchase the struggling paper with a partner’s help. Otis was not a man willing to share power. He bought out his partner and instituted dictatorial control of the Times. Otis and LA’s other printers were virulently anti-union. Along with other merchants, they organized the Merchants and Manufacturers Association to ensure they remained “masters of our own business.” Members promised not to hire union members, to use lockouts and blacklists to break the unions, and to provide financial support for their fellow members if their workers struck.

    When the typographical worker’s union struck LA’s printers in 1890 in protest of wage cuts, Otis joined the other LA papers to break the back of the union. His fellow printers caved, but not Otis. When the union abandoned the fight in 1895, the LA Times became the only non-union shop in the LA newspaper business. Otis became a symbol of anti-union capitalists unwilling to negotiate wages or working conditions. 

    The Times Owner’s Swift Response

    Detective William J. Burns. Head and shoulders portrait. Between 1900 and 1920. Library of Congress.

    In the early morning hours of October 1, 1910, a bomb destroyed the LA Times building, killing 21 workers and injuring many others. While the destroyed plant still smoldered and authorities searched for survivors and clues to what happened, Otis persuaded another printer to run an abbreviated edition of the Times with headlines proclaiming Union Bombs Wreck the Times. Police discovered an unexploded bomb at his residence the same day, which cemented Otis’s view that unions were attacking him and his business in retaliation for his firm stance against their cause. To Otis, being a union member was synonymous with being an anarchist or socialist; all were radicals bent on destroying property rights and the American system of government. One month before the attack on the Times, an unexploded bomb was found at the Alexandra Hotel Annex in downtown LA, and on Christmas Day, a local non-union iron works plant suffered a bombing. Otis was convinced these bombs signaled a dangerous new phase in a radical campaign to destroy capitalism. He pledged to fight back hard.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation did not exist in 1910, so Otis and the Merchants and Manufacturers Association turned to the most famous private investigator in the United States, William Burns, to find the culprits. Burns believed the case was the most important of his career. If he could identify the bombers and prove the case against them in a court of law, he would not only cement his reputation as the nation’s best investigator but also make himself rich. Burns spared no expense traveling the country in search of clues. His break came when he linked a bombing in Illinois to the attacks in LA. 

    The Arrest and Trial of the Suspects

    Newspapers closely covered the hunt for suspects in the LA Times bombing and the subsequent trial. “Wreck of the Los Angeles Times building, photographed on the morning after it was dynamited… and a portrait of Detective William J. Burns.” April 24, 1911. The San Francisco Call. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers.

    Bombers often use consistent methods and materials in creating their devices. Having learned to build a bomb successfully, they repeat the process, sticking with what worked before. Burns and his agents were already investigating a bomb attack on a railroad yard in Peoria, Illinois, when the MMA hired them to investigate the LA attacks. Burns and his agents identified the materials and bomb-making methods used in the Peoria bomb closely resembled those used in the deadly bomb that destroyed the LA Times building. They traced the purchase of materials used in the bomb, and that trail led them to the brother and known associates of John McNamara, the Secretary-Treasurer of the International Association of Bridge and Structural Iron Workers. One of McNamara’s hired men, a man named Ortie McManigal, was arrested and confessed to planting several bombs. 

    The arrest of union members in connection with the LA bombing enraged union leaders and their supporters. Samuel Gompers of the American Federation of Labor and “Big Bill” of the Industrial Workers of the World was convinced that Otis hired Bill Burns to plant evidence implicating union leaders. He fought back by hiring the nation’s best-known defense attorney, Clarence Darrow. Darrow quickly learned that the evidence Burns had developed proved that McManigal and the McNamara brothers were guilty. A plea bargain agreement was reached, and all three men switched their pleas to guilty and received lengthy prison sentences, shocking Gompers, Haywood, and union members across the country.

    Teaching the Complexities of the Labor Struggle

    AFL
    Samuel Gompers. (c.1920). Underwood & Underwood. Library of Congress.

    The LA Times bombing is not emphasized in many history classrooms today. Teachers are more likely to teach the Railroad Strike of 1877 and the Homestead Strike of 1892. Why? A domestic terror attack by a labor union is just as disturbing as the Pinkertons’ assault on steel workers in Homestead, PA. One possible answer invokes the old adage, history is written by the winners. The Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 banned yellow-dog contracts in which workers promised not to join a union and restricted the use of injunctions blocking strikes, picketing, and boycotts. The law boosted the strength of unions and helped lead to high union membership in the 50s and 60s. In the 1960s, most Americans would not have associated union membership with incidents of domestic terrorism. 

    Another possibility is historical awareness of the imbalance of power between unions and industrialists of the late 19th and early 20th century. Industrial owners held the stronger hand. When they were unable to impose their will on workers, they turned to courts and state officials to block activities that they believed threatened violence. Employers had a powerful argument. Domestic peace and prosperity depend on a stable workforce. And violence threatened entire communities. Perhaps American history students should learn about the LA Times bombing so they understand the complexities of the labor struggle in this era.

    Ray Tyler

    Ray Tyler was the 2014 James Madison Fellow for South Carolina and a 2016 graduate of Ashland University’s Masters Program in American History and Government. Ray is a former Teacher Program Manager for TAH and a frequent contributor to our blog.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Creamy Pumpkin Smoothie (With Protein!)

    Creamy Pumpkin Smoothie (With Protein!)

    [ad_1]

    Now that it’s fall it’s officially PSL (pumpkin spice latte) season. And if you live where it’s still 80 degrees in October like I do, a pumpkin smoothie is a more refreshing way to get those fall flavors. Even if you don’t, I still recommend this protein-packed, creamy smoothie.

    It’s easy enough to make for breakfast and has a nice mix of healthy fats, protein, and a little carbs. Plus with the pumpkin in it, it even has some veggies. You could have it as a post-workout snack or whip some up for dessert. The kids won’t even know it doesn’t have ice cream in it. Although, I don’t have anything against healthy ice cream now and then.

    This smoothie is naturally gluten-free and can easily be made dairy-free.

    Pumpkin Spice Smoothie Ingredients

    I used raw milk for this, but you could substitute any milk you prefer. If you’re looking for a dairy-free option, then cashew milk would taste really good. Unsweetened almond milk or coconut milk are some more non-dairy milk options.

    Many pumpkin smoothies call for vanilla yogurt but most of these have added sugars. I prefer to use plain Greek yogurt (lower in sugar and high in protein) then add my own vanilla and natural sweetener. If you prefer not to use the maple syrup, then try raw honey, stevia, or even a frozen banana.

    And if you want to stay dairy-free, there are a lot of good dairy-free yogurts at stores now. You can even make your own coconut milk yogurt.

    Pumpkin

    What would a pumpkin pie smoothie be without some pumpkin? You can use homemade or canned pumpkin here. Since the recipe doesn’t call for much it’s a good time to use that leftover pumpkin puree. I recommend staying away from pumpkin pie filling though. These already have the spices mixed in, but they’re also full of lots of unhealthy sugar.

    Pumpkin Pie Smoothie Toppings

    Dress up your smoothie with some toppings! These can add a little extra crunch and nutrition. Here are a few ideas

    pumpkin smoothie

    Healthy Pumpkin Pie Smoothie Recipe

    This protein-packed pumpkin spice smoothie tastes like a milkshake with its fall flavors. It makes for a yummy breakfast smoothie or snack.

    • Blend all the ingredients until smooth in a blender.

    • Top with cinnamon and coconut sugar or your favorite topping, if desired. Enjoy!

    Nutrition Facts

    Healthy Pumpkin Pie Smoothie Recipe

    Amount Per Serving (1 serving)

    Calories 168
    Calories from Fat 36

    % Daily Value*

    Fat 4g6%

    Saturated Fat 2g13%

    Polyunsaturated Fat 0.1g

    Monounsaturated Fat 1g

    Cholesterol 42mg14%

    Sodium 102mg4%

    Potassium 313mg9%

    Carbohydrates 18g6%

    Fiber 1g4%

    Sugar 13g14%

    Protein 15g30%

    Vitamin A 4902IU98%

    Vitamin C 1mg1%

    Calcium 233mg23%

    Iron 1mg6%

    * Percent Daily Values are based on a 2000 calorie diet.

    The nutrition data is for one serving of smoothie without any toppings.

    More Pumpkin Recipes

    Looking for some new recipes to try? Here are some more of my family’s favorite fall-inspired dishes.

    Are you a fan of pumpkin spice flavors? What are some of your favorite ways to use pumpkin? Leave a comment and let us know!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to Reach FIRE Based on Your Income ($45K

    How to Reach FIRE Based on Your Income ($45K

    [ad_1]

    What does it mean to “win” financially in your income bracket? To us, the end goal is always FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early), and if you’re chasing financial freedom, this is the show for you. We’re breaking down the money moves you need to make based on your income bracket, going from $45,000 to $100,000 per year, and how to stretch your dollar the furthest so you can invest, save, and reach FIRE faster.

    If you’re at the lower end of the income scale, we’ll give you time-tested methods to boost your income and use your time wisely so you can start stockpiling cash TODAY. If you have a high income, there’s still work to be done as you need to find the best way to keep the most of your income so you can use it to acquire wealth-building assets.

    Regardless of how much money you make, you CAN achieve FIRE if you know the proper steps. The good news? We’re sharing those steps today, so stick around!

    Mindy:
    Wealth building isn’t just about how much you earn, but how much you save and invest, which is why today we are diving into a topic that I think is going to resonate with a lot of people how to win financially. No matter what income bracket you’re in, whether you’re just starting out with a low salary, climbing your way up or already earning a six figure income, there are strategies that can help you reach your financial goals. Hello, hello, hello and welcome to the BiggerPockets Money podcast. My name is Mindy Jensen and with me as always is my definitely in sum income bracket. Co-host, Scott Trench,

    Scott:
    Capital introduction, Mindy, just capital BiggerPockets has a goal of creating 1 million millionaires. You are in the right place if you want to get your financial house in order and achieve some capital gains because we truly believe financial freedom is attainable for everyone no matter when or where you’re starting. And today we’re going to discuss how to make the biggest financial impact that 45, 75 and a hundred thousand dollars a year in income to propel you on your financial independence journey. We’re going to talk about what investment strategies should stay the same between those three income brackets and what should be different as you increase your income. Okay, Mindy, so let’s start off with how you would approach a $45,000 per year salary starting today.

    Mindy:
    Okay, at the very beginning of the intro I said wealth building isn’t just about how much you earn, but how much you save and invest. And in the $45,000 tax bracket in the $45,000 income, you don’t have a ton of opportunities to save and invest in large amounts. I want you to first go back to the basics. You are likely at more of the beginning of your career and you have time on your side, which is what I am assuming. I want you to max out your Roth IRA. The contribution limits for under 50 20, 24 is $7,000. That is a little bit over $500 a month. I want you to figure out how you can take $500 a month and put it into your Roth IRA. I think that would be a huge benefit for you right now. I also want you to look at your company’s 401k options.
    Do you have a 401k? Do you have a 4 0 3 B? If you’re a government employee, you may have a 4 57 plan. So I want to know what your company is offering as far as a match to your 401k because we are looking for ways to invest and when your company matches the money that you’re putting into the account, we call that free money here. I want you to take advantage of every free dollar you possibly can If your company has a Roth 401k option, I think that’s a great thing to look into as well. It’s got the difference between a Roth and a traditional account is that you pay the taxes now on the rough and then it grows tax free and you withdraw it tax free down the road. So if you’re 20, 25, 30 years old, you have a long runway for this to grow tax free.
    If you’re 45, 50, 60, you don’t have as much time for that to compound and grow in the Roth plans. You also might be making more money, in which case reducing your current taxable income could be your goal. That’s what my goal is. But if you are making $45,000 a year, let’s say you’re spending 25 or 30, you’re paying taxes on it. There’s just not a ton of money leftover and I hate to say leftover to contribute to these accounts. Again, assuming that you’re a younger person, I’m going to encourage you to look at side income side hustles so that you can generate more income to more easily fund that Roth IRA and potential 401k contributions. Scott, what are your tips for people making $45,000 a year?

    Scott:
    I’m going to get way more aggressive than what you just said there and say, look, if you’re making $45,000 a year, you’re just getting started or something drastic needs to change if you want to achieve financial independence because you ain’t achieving financial independence in a hurry, making $45,000 a year. So the whole game becomes how do we change the fact that you’re making $45,000 a year, which is fundamentally incongruent with the achievement of very early financial independence like 10, 15, 20 years at minimum here. So I would be throwing out a lot of the long-term saving and investing advice. The question is how can we get expenses extremely low and build up a cash position, which allows us to exploit the next set of opportunities and how do we gear up for the career pivot or entrepreneurial venture or house hack that can actually begin exploding income?
    I was in this position to start my career. I was 23 making 48 KA year. That’s more today adjusted for inflation of course than 40 5K. It’s about 60 K, but in that situation, my day was I would get up, make my own breakfast, pack my own lunch drive or bike to work in my Corolla if I was driving or on my $250 bicycle that I purchased from a coworker. If it was a nice day and I could bike and in the evenings as soon as I stopped, I would uber or tutor or figure out a way to earn side hustle income and this way I saved up about 20 K by living with a roommate to be able to make the next big investment. So that’s the goal. I would forget the Roth or the 401k or whatever and I’d just stick cash in a savings account because the problem isn’t whether, which vehicle you’re taking, the problem is that even if you saved all of the $45,000, you wouldn’t achieve fire in the next 10 to 15 years on that unless you got pretty lucky from an investment standpoint.
    So we need to increase that income with that cash position and the very low cost lifestyle. I would be looking for an opportunity within the next six months to a year to dramatically accelerate that income. If that was in the current position, that’s one thing, but probably unlikely I’d be looking for a sales gig or an opportunity to go to work at a startup or I’d be thinking about the small business and a world and how to maybe acquire or get into that if I could partner with somebody, but I would be stockpiling cold hard cash in the form of digital savings in the bank account, of course in the checking your savings account and I’d be looking to use that opportunity. So example what that could look like. You earn $45,000 a year, you try to save 10, $15,000 of it in emergency reserve, maybe 20, and then you go after a house hack.
    The ideal house hack I would say in Denver, Colorado at this moment or where I’d be sniffing around for opportunity is I’d be looking for a four or five bedroom house in a specific part of town called Aurora near a medical campus. I have this all located, you should get this specific for yourself over the next six months to a year while you study this in your market, wherever that is. By way looking to it for a four to five bedroom house with two to three baths, I’d be looking for a large yard that would enable or allow the option for an A DU to be constructed and I would be thinking about can I live in that house and rent out the other bedrooms? Can I construct an A DU and live in that and Airbnb the house? What are my options there to be able to provide a really good opportunity?
    I’d also be looking at consumable mortgages in that particular area of town. It may be different in yours. There’s a lot of assumable mortgages which are perfect for somebody in this position because you don’t need as much income to qualify for an assumable mortgage if it has that last year’s or 2021 or previous lower interest rate mortgages. So I’d be getting really aggressive about those things and stockpiling cash to enable myself to make that career or house hacking pivot because the investing doesn’t make sense at this base or it’s way dramatically outweighed by the opportunities to switch career or house hack, which the cash directly enables by giving you some cushion there. So how do you feel about that? Very different answer, Mindy. I

    Mindy:
    Will agree to disagree. I like what you’re saying about stockpiling cash and taking advantage and reducing your expenses. You said you packed your own lunch, you biked to work, you did side hustles and you had a roommate. I have heard story after story from people who aren’t on the path of financial independence who make 45, $50,000 a year and go out to lunch every day because that’s what all their coworkers do. They drive to work in that brand new car that they bought for high school or college graduation because they deserve it and they don’t do side hustles because I’m in my twenties, I want to live my life and they don’t have a roommate. They had roommates all through college and they just want to be by themselves and those are choices that they’re making. I’m not sure if those are choices that they’re making, consciously understanding the financial impact.
    I think those are choices that they’re making based on wants once instead of needs. So I see where you’re coming from. I love that advice. I still want to go back to the Roth IRA. If you are young, you have so much runway to grow tax-free. That is a gift. Also get an HSA, but I think that the bottom line, Scott, is that income needs to increase if you want to reach financial independence and at $45,000, there’s just not a lot of extra to be putting into your wealth building, which is why your tip about reducing your expenses is really, really, really key.

    Scott:
    Stay tuned for more on how to change up your investing strategies with more income after a quick break,

    Mindy:
    Let’s jump back in.

    Scott:
    I’m literally saying if you’re trying to go retire, traditionally you can retire traditionally by saving 10 15% of that 40 5K salary and investing it in a Roth, IRA, Dave Ramsey, Ramit, all these other great personal finance folks, they’re good resources for that and you should do that. But if you’re trying to fire, if you’re trying to retire early in 10 to 15 years, don’t do that. Save a bunch of cash and use that to manufacture opportunities. Don’t blow the cash but just stockpile it for one year and I promise that if you couple that with reading 30 50 business books in your spare time and tons of side hustles, the opportunities that emerge for you will be better than a 10% stock market return on average around that. For that I promise I don’t know, but I would way rather take that bet and that’s what I did when I was in that position and I think that it will pay off really handsomely to have that cash stock piled rather than having a little bit of money in that first Roth.
    Again, if you’re trying to get there very quickly, there’ll be time to catch up that Roth and 401k later when we really go after our income, but that’s a huge, I am literally suggesting that you go through 30 to 50 business books during this time period, side hustle a lot and really treat the situation of earning 40 5K is an emergency and that in the next year that is going to be going up and there’s going to be an opportunity set that will emerge that will allow me to make much more than that. On a go forward basis, if you want to fire well in advance of traditional retirement age, there’s no really way around how to fire with 40 5K. The answer is, and you’ll find a lot of people here on BiggerPockets money who fired starting from an income of $45,000. You’re going to find very few who never materially changed that starting point of $45,000 and that’s also a frustration people say is, oh, this person made 150 K.
    Well guess what? If you’re capable of saving 30 40% of $45,000 salary and you read a bunch of business books and you listen to podcasts, you will accumulate first tens and then hundreds of thousands of dollars in assets, maybe a million dollars in assets, people who are capable and disciplined enough to amass and then effectively manage a million dollars in assets, often have job opportunities and can drive much more value than that at businesses to earn more money. So this will all work together and compound. It just needs to start with a major pivot and new orientation around that I think and the aggressive accumulation of cash to seize those opportunities.

    Mindy:
    Scott, now let’s look at a $75,000 income you’re making. I would say significantly more than you need to live off of, especially if you’re able to live off of this 45,000, I think you’re making significantly more than you need to bare bones live. I know there’s people that are going to say, oh, I can’t live off 75. Okay, great for you, but these are people who are living off of 75. What would you do differently at a $75,000 income than you would or recommend at a $45,000 income?

    Scott:
    So I think that the game has changed a little bit at $75,000 and it depends on the type of income, right? So if you’re a salesperson making $75,000, well there’s opportunity to really expand that and that changes the way I think about investing a little bit more than, for example, a teacher who may be making $75,000 between their base salary and summer gig for example in there, if you’re in the teaching profession for example, with that $75,000 in combined income and benefits, again including a summer job, I know that many teachers do not earn $75,000 per year, especially earlier in the career, but that’s a case where I would say, okay, now let’s go down the ladder of these retirement accounts and say, okay, how do I put this into tax advantaged accounts like the Roth, like the 401k, like the HSA. I know the teachers actually have different versions of those here, but I think that that’s where I would be thinking about, I’m going to use these tax advantage retirement accounts.
    Maybe in the off time I’m going to be thinking about maybe a real estate project every couple of years, save up some cash for that, but I’m going to be moving down that stack and thinking, can I get to 30 40% of the income and yeah, you can probably fire in about 17 to 22 years starting from upstanding position if you’re able to save 30, 40, maybe get approaching that 50% mark on that income, which of course will get easier as the investments pile on and add a little bit more income on top of that base salary. So that’s one approach. If I’m going to be a little bit more aggressive about this and I’m in more of that sales approach or I am expecting my career to accelerate at a faster clip, maybe I’m on the corporate finance track and I’m thinking that the 70 5K today should be bumping up against a hundred thousand in three to five years.
    Okay, maybe now I’m actually thinking about this is the more aggressive period of my investment career and I’m going to start saving up as much cash as possible and getting a couple of those rental properties done now so that by the time I fire in 15 years or 10 to 15 years, there’ll be a little bit more lightly leveraged and producing a little bit more cashflow. So that’s how I’d be thinking about it in those kinds of maybe two different types of scenarios. One that’s a little bit more static, 75,001 that’s more in a trajectory that’s moving me towards six figures or beyond.

    Mindy:
    I like what you’re saying there. Did you say index funds? Because I think at 75,000 you should be starting investing in the stock market.

    Scott:
    So lemme put this, I’ll restate this. If I’m in the more static progression in my career, I’m not expecting my income to surge over the next two to three years, then I would be investing in index funds or thinking about those types of investments. The decision about how to invest really depends on my aggression and timeline here. Let’s say that I am a teacher and my pension is going to mature in 20 years. Well, I’m probably not going to retire in 15 years. Even if I’m capable of doing that because I’m giving up one of the best assets of that profession, I’m probably going to be thinking about a more passive approach that’s going to get me there with a lot less headache. Maybe at that point I’m going to invest in index funds if I’m in a more aggressive pursuit of financial independence and I don’t have those types of timelines and I always want to get there as fast as possible, I’m probably waiting much more heavily towards real estate in the early years because real estate comes with the benefits of leverage and that compounding, and I’m thinking about maybe if I’m going to take the 401k match, maybe I’ll max that HSA, but I’m probably going to be, if I’m having to make trade-offs here, which most people at the $75,000 per year income range are going to have, I’m probably thinking if I want that portfolio, my end state and maybe a million in real estate, maybe a million in stocks, it’s a great idea in my view to buy that real estate earlier in the journey because you get the benefits of leverage and by the time you want to retire, the portfolio will be de-leveraging and you’ll be able to get more cashflow from that as you’ve paid off the mortgage and as rent growth has come on.
    So I would probably wait towards real estate first and then as I get closer to financial dependence, really focus on that stock portfolio in these tax advantaged accounts.

    Mindy:
    We have to take one final break, but stick around for more on maximizing your income when we’re back.

    Scott:
    Welcome back to the show.

    Mindy:
    I want to look at $75,000 a year. I’m thinking that your job has a little bit more responsibility so you have more obligations to be at work to be doing things for work and you have less free time. I don’t see side hustles as a really big part of your wealth building journey At 75,000 and above. I see more unless you have some rockstar side hustle that is taking little time or easy to automate. I’m looking more at passive income streams. The stock market is a great go-to especially when you don’t want to be doing real estate syndications. If you can get a really great syndicator, if you can get a really great product, if you can get a really great property, syndications are a great source of passive income. I also really like private lending. That’s one of my favorite ways to generate some pretty good income short-term loans that I am doing like three-ish months. We had the authors of Lend to Live, which is a BiggerPockets book on the show a few months ago. They both have different ways of looking at the way that they lend, they lend. One of them lends more to the person than the deal and one lends more to the deal than the person. I am definitely on person more than the deal side. I typically lend only to people that I know can pay me back.

    Scott:
    How much capital do you need to privately lend?

    Mindy:
    I do private. I have done many private loans at around $50,000.

    Scott:
    Okay.

    Mindy:
    I have done private loans at higher amounts, but I don’t think that’s necessary to get into private lending. There’s also a lot of ways that you can lend without being the middleman. You hand the money to the middleman and they take care of it, and that’s a way to get into it at lower amounts. You don’t like private lending at 75,000.

    Scott:
    I was just thinking, I’m putting myself on the, I know you can do this with less capital, but I’m just putting my hat on of I earn less than $75,000. I’m listening and I’m like, well, can I really actually buy a $50,000 loan on a rental property? Is that even possible? And then do I have the capital to do that in liquidity at that point in time? So I wanted to just check in on that to see for those who might think that it’s less feasible to actually pull that off in that income bracket.

    Mindy:
    And that’s a good point. You do have to have some income to lend. You can’t just be like, yeah, I’ll lend you 50,000 and then like, Ooh, where am I going to get 50,000 from? But I like that as a passive income source. Again, you have to know what you’re doing. You should definitely read that book and learn about this process before you get into it. But I like the passive income streams at 75,000 and above the stock market. I am always going to be pro stock market. I have done very well in the stock market, but again, in your $75,000 income, this is not a free for all spend, whatever you want, keeping your expenses low, investing intelligently and with purpose at $75,000 a year, you’re working with other people who are now saying, oh, I got this hot stock tip. There’s no such thing as a hot stock tip.
    Don’t buy that hot stock. That’s never going to work out. You’re making a good income. I wouldn’t say this is fire income yet. It’s fire a bowl, but your fire journey is going to be longer, especially with how much you’re spending if you can get your income or your expenses way down. Again, house hacking, living in a low cost of living area, having an older car riding your bike to work, living close enough that you can ride your bike to work. There’s lots of ways to cut down your expenses so that you can save more.

    Scott:
    Yeah, look, I think that a reality of fire that we probably need to just address is even at 45, 45, let’s take the 45 example. If you just saved a hundred percent of your income for 20 years, that’s 900 grand plus the investment returns, maybe you’re getting to fire in 20 years, it’s just not enough income. You just can’t do it with that. It has to change. The income has to change. If you want to fire, let’s use the same example with 750 in 10 years, you’re going to save 750 grand. If you save 100% of that and paid no tax on it, it’s still fundamentally the blocker for fire. So you either have to be on a trajectory to increase that income there or begin taking much more risky or more aggressive or sacrifice investments or you have to sacrifice like the house hack so you’re still in that position.
    This is not an income level that will support rapid achievement of fire unless you’re going to serial house hack, unless you’re going to live and flip, unless you’re going to make big changes here. But I’m still not in the position of saying that we can achieve fire with 70 5K in income in a really robust timeline without continuing to make changes on those fronts. You’re looking at at least 20 years, I think even if you’re saving 30, 40, 50% of that in the stock market, and that’s if things go well and the trajectory kind of continues to climb. But I think that that’s still fundamentally the issue here and that’s how I’d be thinking about it. Even at 70 5K, I don’t even know. Moving on to the next bracket, if it changes that much at a hundred K here, a hundred K is now we’re earning a pretty serious income and if we save 30 to 50% of that, we’re talking about maybe 30 to 40 grand a year after taxes, for example, and that’s going to take you what?
    400 k, 800 k, 400 k in savings over 10 years, 800 k over 20 years, and you’re still living a very modest lifestyle at that point in time on that income. So I think we continue in the fire journey to have this dependence on these fairly high leverage investments. Remember, our goal here is to achieve a retirement level of wealth way before most people, so a hundred k, we’re starting to get this much more doable. If you do go down the traditional retirement stack ladder, I don’t think you’re going to be able to do it at 75,000. I think you’re going to have to do the live and flip Mindy for example, or whatever. You might be able to do it at a hundred, especially if there are, like we mentioned earlier, good income jump opportunities, but now we’re really flirting with that border of yeah, I think you could get pretty close in about 15 to 20 years if you had a low cost of living and you went down the traditional money guy or Dave Ramsey retirement planning stack, and he said, okay, I’m going to max out the HSA, I’m going to take my 401k and then max out the 401k.
    If I can contribute anywhere else and maybe save a little bit in after tax brokerage account. You could get there with a fairly passive investing strategy if you are really tight on the expense side and consistent over a decade or two, at least almost about two decades, maybe two decades plus in this route. But I would still be thinking I need to layer in a couple of fairly substantial bets or using my housing as a tool to supplement the journey to fire. Even at a hundred thousand dollars a year in income, I think you’d still have to house hack live and flip or think about some other side project like building a real estate portfolio in order to really get there in a reasonable timeframe. What do you think about that? Mindy?

    Mindy:
    I don’t want to agree with you, Scott, because I see a hundred thousand dollars a year and I think, wow, that’s a great income and it is a great income, but I don’t really think that you’re wrong. I’m trying to think back to all the people that we have interviewed who got to a position of zero net worth and then started building and they reached financial independence within 10 years and none of them made $45,000. None of them made $75,000.

    Scott:
    Some of them started there, but none of them finished there.

    Mindy:
    Started, yes, but they didn’t finish there, and I don’t think many of them were only, and I do this in air quotes, only making a hundred thousand dollars. They had two. Now I’m assuming that a hundred thousand is household income, not per person.

    Scott:
    We’ve had several couples who have neither of them made more than a hundred thousand dollars a year.

    Mindy:
    Yes, neither. But together that’s like 150 or $175,000 a year, which is a much more, normal is not the right word. I know people are going to [email protected] to tell him that they don’t want me to say it’s a normal income, but it’s a much more normal tofi income at 175,000 than it is at a hundred thousand. It just takes a lot of money to reach financial independence because you are taking your 35 year career or your 45 year career and you are compressing it. Well, if you’re not going to make all this money for 45 years, you’re going to have to save a whole lot more in order to be able to reach your financial independence goals. So I don’t want to agree with you, but I think you’re right. I think even at a hundred thousand dollars a year, you’ve got to focus on keeping your savings rate at 30, 40, 50, 60%.
    You need to avoid lifestyle creep, especially if you were in that $45,000 bracket and then increase to a hundred, oh my goodness, I got, I doubled my income, now I can spend more. No, you doubled your income now you can save more. Again, reach with the goal of early financial independence, you will have to be saving more and REIT encourages you to enjoy your best life, live your rich life, that’s great. He’s not wrong, but living your rich life and achieving early financial independence is not really two goals that you can do At the same time, you can live a great life while achieving financial independence. You can live a rich life depending on what your definition of a rich life is and reach financial independence, and I encourage you to enjoy the journey to financial independence, but income is going to have to increase because your savings has to increase because you are decreasing your timeline to get to retirement money.

    Scott:
    Yeah, I think that’s right. I think that’s the problem with, again, you can get there. I think a hundred thousand dollars a year in annual income is the starting line for, and let’s define fire. Let’s define fire. There’s all these crazy things here. Jacob Lund, Fisker, early retirement Extreme living off of $7,000 a year out of a trailer. That’s not what we’re about here. That’s awesome that he does that. That’s not what you’re probably listening to. BiggerPockets money in order to achieve fire for, I think the vast majority of listeners, I said this before, I’ve never gotten challenged on it. Please do challenge me if you disagree, is one and a half to two and a half million dollars depending on where you’re located. So when we say that, when we frame that goal, that makes it a little bit more clear that, again, a hundred K is just not going to cut it in terms of firing in a reasonable amount of time.
    You can get there by 55 if you want, if you’re starting at 2025 in there. That’s possible with a hundred K, but we got to still got to supplement at all three of these income levels with them. 40 5K is so little income relative to the needs for fire that the game has to be around. How do I dramatically increase my income at 70 5K? We’re still kind of there, but we can get there if we’re able to have enough side pursuits that can really stack on there, and a hundred K is just a little bit reducing the pressure for those side hustles a little bit more. But in the 70 5K to a hundred K range, I still think you really have to throw in a couple of live-in flips or house hacks at the very least to really have a shot there if there’s not serious potential to expand the income by just sticking with it in the career and continuing to climb the ladder or advance the skillset there.
    And those options I think are necessary that, or building the machine of a real estate portfolio, if your area is conducive to that in that and that income bracket, that’s not going to be practical in Los Angeles, although perhaps a hundred thousand dollars a year income earner or two could find some way to make it work within 50 to a hundred miles of Los Angeles with some sort of live-in flipper house hack getting going here. You’re probably going to need that dual income to really have that opportunity or find something creative. But in other parts of the country that are lower cost of living, that is a reasonable way to go about it. But I think you’re going to have to have that side business where you’re truly adding value as a business and not just passively investing in order to supplement that income and have a real crack at fire within 10 to 15 years.

    Mindy:
    Okay, I want to hear now from our listeners who are sitting here saying, Scott, I totally did that. If you reached Financial independence making 45, 75, a hundred thousand dollars a year household or similar, please email [email protected], [email protected], tell us your story. We want to hear it. But those of you who were making a higher income, we want to hear your stories too. Email me anyway just to say hi email Scott just to say hi. But I do believe that, Scott, you are correct. We’re both correct.

    Scott:
    Yeah, I think there’s a lot of right ways to approach life and building wealth. And again, if you’re not trying to fire, go down the traditional retirement stack, put the money in the 401k and the Roth, start investing today and build for the long term, even if you’re starting at $45,000 a year. But if you want to get rich in 10 to 15 years, you got to play a different set of rules because that ain’t going to do it. It’s just not going to happen there unless you get extremely lucky. And I think I’m not, this is a one to two year delay. I’m not saying do not invest in your 401k. I’m saying for the first next two years, pile up a bunch of cash, read a bunch of books, and find some opportunities to expand the income and then contribute to the 401k in Roth once you solved for the income problem and used every resource at your disposal, including your cash position to seize that next opportunity and then go after it’s a two year delay. And don’t do that. If you’re the type of person who’s just going to blow your money on a boat instead of actually investing it in the next opportunity or investment on this, don’t put it in cash, put it somewhere you can’t touch it. But for the fire community, if you’re going to go after this, go after it and recognize that the investment returns in your first $15,000 are totally immaterial to the 1.5 million to 2.5 million goal you’d know you’ll actually have in terms of reaching fire within the next 10 to 15 years.

    Mindy:
    Alright, Scott, I thought this was a great conversation. I would love to hear from our listeners, either through our Facebook group or if you want to send me or Scott a message [email protected]. [email protected] or the Facebook group, facebook.com/groups/bp money. We would love to hear from you, how did you reach financial independence? What business books do you have to recommend share with our listeners? Alright, Scott, we get out of here.

    Scott:
    Let’s do it.

    Mindy:
    That wraps up this episode of the BiggerPockets Money podcast. He is the Scott Trench. I am Mindy Jensen saying Tooles noodles.

     

    Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

    Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

    Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cecelia Williams Bryant, AME Church minister and mentor to clergy, dies at 77

    Cecelia Williams Bryant, AME Church minister and mentor to clergy, dies at 77

    [ad_1]

    (RNS) — The Rev. Cecelia Williams Bryant, an African Methodist Episcopal Church bishop’s wife known for mentoring up-and-coming clergy and fostering prayer, died on Thursday (Sept. 26), her family announced.

    Bryant, 77, was the episcopal supervisor for the AME districts that her husband, now-retired Bishop John R. Bryant, oversaw. She also was the mother of the Rev. Jamal Bryant, pastor of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church, a predominantly Black megachurch outside Atlanta, and the Rev. Thema Bryant, a Pepperdine University professor and former president of the American Psychological Association.

    “We were blessed to share life with this anointed and dedicated wife, mother, grandmother and liberated global citizen,” Jamal Bryant said in a statement. “Of all her immense talents and gifts, Rev. C was a powerful and committed intercessor on behalf of the poor and vulnerable. I am not the person I am today without her prayers and love, which have been my north star throughout my life.”

    Cecelia Bryant co-founded the AME Church in India with her husband of 55 years and helped to found the AME Church in Cote d’Ivoire, according to The Christian Recorder, the denomination’s official publication. A missionary, author and feminist, she was focused on health, peace and ecological issues and started primary schools in the United States and Africa.

    She “was a commanding disciple who stood deep and strong in her faith and family, while remaining deeply dedicated to the cause of salvation,” said Rep. Kweisi Mfume, D-Md., in a statement on the social platform X. “As an advocate for community healing and mental health awareness, she committed her whole life to spreading the Word of God as a liberating and anointed force to everyone she met.”

    She lived in Baltimore, where she and her husband once served at Bethel AME Church for more than a dozen years, and was known for her support of women and as a model for ministers, men and women who eventually led churches individually or together as co-pastors.


    RELATED: Jamal Bryant on his ‘bittersweet’ transition from one black megachurch to another


    “For those of us who were women entering the ministry in the 1980’s, there were no female role models — except Rev. Cee. She came and installed me at my first church: Mariners’ Temple, brought me in to preach, let me accompany her on Missionary journeys to Guyana, and showed me how to build Christian Women’s ministries and conferences.”

    Cook said about 40 people who were influenced by Cecelia Bryant went on to be senior pastors. She recalled singing in the 1970s in the New Temple Singers choir at the Bryants’ Cambridge, Massachusetts, church with couples such as the Rev. Floyd and Elaine Flake, who later co-pastored Greater AME Cathedral in New York City, and the Revs. Grainger and Jo Ann Browning, who jointly lead Ebenezer AME Church in Fort Washington, Maryland.

    “John and Cecelia Bryant were always public partners in ministry,” said the Rev. Cheryl Townsend Gilkes, professor emerita at Colby College who now teaches at Hartford International University for Religion and Peace. “They were the model for these couples, especially in the AME Church, but also throughout the larger Black church.”

    In her final sermon at New Birth, which was reposted on Jamal Bryant’s Facebook page the day after his mother’s death, Cecelia Bryant joined her husband as they preached together on “The Power of a Praying Church.” She suggested acting on the biblical words in the Apostle Paul’s letter to the Colossians that say “Devote yourself to prayer,” and she gave the congregation directions.

    “Point to yourself and repeat after me: Devote yourself to prayer,” she said, as the people in the pews obeyed. “Lay hands on your head and repeat after me: Devote yourself to prayer. Then point to heaven and say: Devote yourself to prayer. Amen.”

    She later added: “Our call is not to these denominations that we love so much but our call is to become the praying people of God.”

    Gilkes said Cecelia Bryant made a point of bringing women together for conferences, such as one at Princeton Theological Seminary for Black women in ministry that was organized by Renita Weems and Prathia Hall, then PTS doctoral students, in 1983.

    “She was like the mother hen that had brought this group of women who became significant leaders and still are significant leaders,” Cook said.

    The Rev. John Thomas III, editor of The Christian Recorder, said Cecelia Bryant’s emphasis on prayer included her desire for it to be understood in the languages of the countries where she served in ministry.

    “On several occasions, she asked me to help translate prayer calls, and once, I was her interpreter for a sermon in the Dominican Republic at an AME meeting,” he said in an email to RNS about his translations of her English prayers into Spanish. “She was formidable and pushed people to understand how the Holy Spirit moved within them.”


    RELATED: Mother Mary P. Patterson, preserver of Church of God in Christ history, dies at 83


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Shortest-lived quantum particles exhibit quantum entanglement, too | by Ethan Siegel | Starts With A Bang! | Oct, 2024

    Shortest-lived quantum particles exhibit quantum entanglement, too | by Ethan Siegel | Starts With A Bang! | Oct, 2024

    [ad_1]

    This view of the inside of the ATLAS detector, taken when it was not operational, showcases the largest, most massive particle collider detector ever built. The ATLAS collaboration, later confirmed by CMS, was the first to measure entanglement between top-antitop pairs of quarks. (Credit: Marcelloni De Oliveira, Claudia: CERN)

    LHC scientists just showed that spooky quantum entanglement applies to the highest-energy, shortest-lived particles of all: top quarks.

    Of all the spooky quantum phenomena in our Universe, perhaps the spookiest of them all remains quantum entanglement. The basic idea behind it is that particles don’t just exhibit this weird sort of indeterminism — where they propagate as waves, in indeterminate states, but interact like particles with definitive and measurable properties — but that the quantum state of even disconnected particles can be related to one another. When you measure the quantum state of one entangled particle, you instantly know something about the pair that it’s entangled with: not an exactly-determined state, but with sets of probable outcomes that are superior to mere random chance.

    Quantum entanglement has been well explored for conventional particles such as photons, electrons, positrons, protons, neutrons, and other atomic nuclei. However, nearly all of these tests have occurred at relatively low (conventional) energies and for relatively stable (long-lived) particles. Does quantum entanglement work the same way at high energies, and/or for extremely unstable, short-lived particles?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Keurig K-Duo Single Serve + Carafe Coffee Maker Just $99 Shipped on Walmart.com

    Keurig K-Duo Single Serve + Carafe Coffee Maker Just $99 Shipped on Walmart.com

    [ad_1]

    Hip2Save may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you via trusted partners and affiliate links in this post. Prices and availability are accurate as of time posted. Read our full disclosure policy here.

    Walmart has your new favorite coffeemaker, the Keurig K-Duo! 

    Keurig K-Duo Essentials Single Serve K-Cup Pod & Carafe Coffee Maker on counter

    For a limited time, run to Walmart.com where you can snag this Keurig K-Duo Essentials Single Serve K-Cup Pod & Carafe Coffee Maker for just $99 shipped (regularly $119)!

    Keurig K-Duo Essentials Single Serve K-Cup Pod & Carafe Coffee Maker with hand reaching for filled cup

    This Keurig can brew coffee by the cup with K-Cup pods or in the 12-cup carafe with coffee grounds. The 72oz water reservoir provides access to both sides for fast, convenient brewing and fewer refills. Plus, it can do so much more!

    • Brew multiple sizes – when making a single-serve, choose between an 8, 10, or 12oz cup
    • Brew Over Ice – makes iced coffees and teas.
    • Strong Brew – makes bolder, more intense flavors.
    • Pause & Pour – allows you to pause mid-brew to pour coffee and start back up again.

    Check out the helpful reviews for the Keurig K-Duo…

    I love my Keurig Duo coffee maker! It’s so convenient to have the option to brew a single cup or a whole carafe of delicious coffee. The machine is easy to use and easy to clean, and the coffee always tastes great. I highly recommend this coffee maker to anyone looking for a versatile and reliable brewing option!


    Everything you need in a coffee maker. Flexibility in making one big pot or simply one cup at a time. Flavor boost works to make the coffee flavor stronger!


    We have had a Keurig for years. 90% of the time I just want one cup, but when we have guests, or both my husband and I are wanting multiple cups, having the option to brew a pot is nice. Extremely easy to use! 


    Check out even more deals for the home here!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Everything We Know So Far – Hollywood Life

    Everything We Know So Far – Hollywood Life

    [ad_1]

    Lady Gaga Joaquin Phoenix




    View gallery




    Image Credit: Jose Perez / SplashNews

    We’re days away from the Joker sequel we’ve been craving. The highly-anticipated sequel Joker: Folie à Deux wrapped filming in April 2023. Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga are going to knock our socks off as Joker and Harley Quinn, and the trailer was unveiled on Tuesday, July 23. The official trailer gave a look at Arthur Fleck’s trial and showed him and Harley Quinn kissing and dancing.

    Joker: Folie à Deux is the upcoming sequel to 2019’s Joker, which starred the Academy Award winner but did not feature The Crime Queen of Gotham City, Harley Quinn. The Grammy winner was reported to be in “early talks” to play the role in summer 2022 and confirmed the news when she tweeted a teaser video.

    Fans have been waiting on this sequel since the first film’s release. With Joaquin and Gaga playing the iconic evil duo, you know this is going to be a box-office juggernaut. Now that the trailer has officially being unveiled, Hollywood Life is breaking down all you need to know: the release date, the cast, the plot, and more.

    How Far Into Prodcution Is Joker: Folie à Deux?

    Joker: Folie à Deux wrapped filming on April 5, 2023. Todd and Gaga shared new photos of Harley and Joker to celebrate. “That’s a wrap. Thanks to these two (+ the entire cast) and the BEST crew that the film industry has to offer. From top to bottom. Gonna crawl into a cave now (edit room) and put it all together,” Todd wrote on Instagram. Gaga posted the same photo of Harley and captioned it, “That’s a wrap X, Harleen.”

    Fans were gifted their first look at Harley Quinn and the Joker in the upcoming Joker sequel on Valentine’s Day 2023 when the movie’s director, Todd Phillips shared an image to his Instagram of Harley cradling Joker’s face just inches from her own. The pair appeared to just get done locking lips, as Joker’s red lipstick was smeared on Harley’s lips. The photo, which can be seen here, was also shared by Gaga. She captioned it with the film’s title.

    Lady Gaga
    Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix filming the ‘Joker’ sequel. (Jose Perez / SplashNews)

    Over the course of filming, Gaga and Joaquin were spotted filming all over New York. They were notably seen filming on the iconic Joker stairs, which are located in The Bronx.

    Todd revealed Joker: Folie à Deux began filming on December 10, 2022. He took to Instagram to share the news with a photo of Joaquin getting his face shaved. “Day 1. Our boy. #joker,” he wrote.

    Joker: Folie à Deux Release Date

    Joker: Folie à Deux is set to be released on October 4, 2024. Joker was originally intended to be a standalone film, but the movie’s success led to a sequel getting the green light. In the months after Joker’s release, reports about a sequel being developed went around. In June 2022, Todd confirmed Joker 2 by posting photos on Instagram of the official script and Joaquin reading it.

    Trailer

    The first trailer for the film was released in April 2024.

    Who Is In The Cast Of Joker: Folie à Deux?

    We have Arthur Fleck, a.k.a. the Joker and Harley Quinn accounted for, but who else is expected to be in the highly-anticipated film? Zazie Beetz is returning as Sophie Dumond, the single mother who resides in the same apartment building as Arthur. The Joker created a fantastical relationship with her in the 2019 film, which abruptly ended when she found him in her apartment.

    Zazie, Gaga, and Joaquin’s parts are the only ones named on the film’s IMDb page, although other names are listed. Brendan Gleeson, Catherine Keener, Harry Lawtey, and Jacob Lofland are also listed higher up in the movie’s roster of actors, but their parts are not revealed. Harry, known for the HBO series Industry, has a “big” role in the film, according to Deadline.

    As previously mentioned, Todd is returning to direct the sequel. Impressively, he co-wrote the with Scott Silver and is producing with Bradley Cooper.

    What Is the Plot Of Joker: Folie à Deux?

    Along with the casting, the plot of Joker: Folie à Deux has been kept under wraps. However, fans know it is a musical. “It’s an interesting decision. And I think it’s really exciting to see how it unfolds. And I think it’s somehow logical at the same time. It’s both logical and also very surprising,” composer Hildur Guðnadóttir told Variety in January 2023. “For me as well as the audience. So far it’s just been a really beautiful conversation and I’m really excited to see how it unfolds.”

    According to Variety, the film was given the R-rated label because it contains “strong violence” and “brief full nudity.”

    Joaquin Phoenix
    Joaquin Phoenix returns as Arthur Fleck/Joker. (Jason Howard/Bauergriffin.com /MEGA)

    We’re in for a real treat with Joker and Harley Quinn. Watching their partnership unfold is going to be a wild ride. “Folie à Deux” in French means “delusion or mental illness shared by two people in close association,” according to Oxford Languages.

    How Does Joker: Folie à Deux Work With Margot Robbie’s Movies?

    As fans know, Barbie star Margot Robbie played Harley Quinn in 2020’s Birds of Prey and 2021’s Suicide Squad, which may confuse fans about how both versions of the chaotic but fan-favorite villain can exist. Gaga’s Harley “exists in a different DC universe than Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn,” according to The Hollywood Reporter. Case solved!

    Margot previously raved about the “Just Dance” hitmaker taking on the role. “It’s such an honor to have built a foundation strong enough that Harley can now be one of those characters who other actors get to have a go at playing,” she said during an October 2022 interview with MTV, per PEOPLE. “And I think she’ll do something incredible with it.”



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Must Read: LVMH Sells Off-White, Everlane Names Alfred Chang as CEO

    Must Read: LVMH Sells Off-White, Everlane Names Alfred Chang as CEO

    [ad_1]


    These are the stories making headlines in fashion on Tuesday. LVMH sells Off-WhiteLVMH has sold Off-White, founded in 2012 by Virgil Abloh, to Bluestar Alliance. Terms of the transaction have not been disclosed, and Bluestar Alliance’s CEO Joey Gabbay said in a press release that this acquisition …

    Continue reading

    [ad_2]

    Source link